Home
/
Brands
/
ASICS
/
GT-2000
/
GT-2000 13

ASICS GT-2000 13

Name: ASICS GT-2000 13
Brand: ASICS
Rating: 4.3 (51 reviews)

Daily trainer · Neutral · Road · 9.6 oz · Narrow

The ASICS GT-2000 13 rates in the 3rd percentile overall among daily trainers, on 51 runner reviews here plus retailer ratings. Its strongest dimension is cushioning (67th percentile); its weakest is looks (2nd). Of 8 runners who came to it from another shoe, 4 preferred it to what they ran before.

Below average

54/100

Overall

Below average 54

Cushioning

Cushioning rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Very good (80/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 67% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

Very good 80

Durability

Durability rating

Better Shoes Rating

Good (72/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 49% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

Good 72

Value

Value rating

Better Shoes Rating

Average (65/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 26% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

Average 65

Comfort

Comfort rating

Better Shoes Rating

Below average (51/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 2% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

Below average 51

Appearance

Appearance rating

Better Shoes Rating

Below average (51/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 2% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

Below average 51

What runners say

“Using for 10 years, never had trouble, usually gets 400-500 miles per shoe.”

freerider004 4/5 Full review

“Running in the 2000 series for 14+ years practically injury free.”

myth 5/5 Full review

“Just enough cushion to soften impact on roads without feeling like a marshmallow.”

4/5 Full review

“It's actually a lot more bouncy than the shoetubers say.”

ukathleticscoach 4/5 Full review

“Very good combination of support, cushioning, and responsiveness.”

5/5 Full review

“Bought as a walking shoe but will probably switch it to running as it's still a bit soft for walking.”

ukathleticscoach 4/5 Full review

“Possibly surpassing what is expected compared to similarly priced shoes.”

KAC 5/5 Full review

“Caused extra calf and underfoot tightness due to how they cause the foot to land.”

KAC 5/5 Full review

“Fits better than anything else found, but not nearly as well as the discontinued 2100 series.”

4/5 Full review

“Feel a bit slow, hard to run really fast.”

4/5 Full review

Would buy again

100% 1/1

Prefer this shoe over another

42% 5/12

Where to buy

We may earn a commission on these links. It never affects our ratings.

Dick's Sporting Goods

$139.99

Best price on White

Buy at Dick's Sporting Goods

Other colorway prices

Offer	Retailer
$140 in Orange / Red	Dick's Sporting Goods
$140 in Matcha	Dick's Sporting Goods

More colorway prices

$150 in Lime Green

Dick's Sporting Goods

Buy at Dick's Sporting Goods for $139.99

Buy

Pros & Cons

Pros

Holds up to daily mileage better than many trainers.
Light for an everyday trainer at 9.6 ounces.
A popular, well-liked pick in a long-running ASICS line.

Cons

Step-in comfort trails most competing daily trainers.
Ride feels firmer than rivals.
Overall it lags better-rounded trainers in its class.

Reader Ratings

58 reader ratings

5/5

4/5

3/5

2/5

1/5

Runner reviews

Write a review

Reader review

ukathleticscoach · Jun 12, 2026

4/5

Overall

Great shoes its actually a lot more bouncy than the shoetubers say. Actually bought a walking shoes but will probably switch it to running as its still a bit soft for walking. Tried jogs and feels better running. I have regular - high arches but if you are flat footed the arch will bother you. The only downside but its really annoying is the tongue is too thin. The lockdown would be great but then it hurts the top of my foot. That would be good in a race or tempo shoe but stability! They just do it to get the headline weight down knowing you wont notice in the shop Still the shoe is very good overall good grip etc nice upper. I actually have a neutral gait but get pf hence the shoe. If they just made more stable neutral shoes i though obvious faults like bending in middle Boston 13 instead of mets (toes) it would be better. Thats what gives you pf in the 1st place!!! I think version 14/15 same just slightly bouncier yu have flat feet tha

Comfort: 4/5
Cushioning: 4/5
Durability: 4/5
Appearance: 3/5
Value: 4/5

Great Shoes for Trainers, Not Great For Races

Anonymous runner · Dec 6, 2024

5/5

Overall

The shoes are super solid trainers, just a little too heavy for races or workouts. Overall pretty great though.

Comfort: 4/5
Cushioning: 4/5
Durability: 5/5
Appearance: 5/5
Value: 4/5

ASICS version of Nike Pegasus

EPO sedjati · Dec 3, 2024

4/5

Overall

Solid shoe.

Comfort: 3/5
Cushioning: 3/5
Durability: 4/5
Appearance: 4/5
Value: 3/5

Asics GT 2000 13

KAC · Nov 13, 2024

5/5

Overall

The shoes are definitely worth the money they cost, possibly even surpassing what is expected of them compared to similarly prices shoes. While they are greatly priced, they did cause me to have extra calf and underfoot tightness due to how they cause your foot to land. That still wouldn't dissuade me from purchasing them again, but it's still never happened to me with other shoes before.

Comfort: 4/5
Cushioning: 4/5
Durability: 4/5
Appearance: 5/5
Value: 5/5