ASICS GT-2000 5

Trail · Stability · 11 oz · 10mm drop

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The ASICS GT-2000 6 replaced it

How it ranks

The ASICS GT-2000 5 rates in the 37th percentile overall among trail shoes. Its strongest dimension is cushioning (87th percentile); its weakest is looks (23rd).

Based on 8 runner reviews.

ASICS GT-2000 5

/ 5

Good

Overall rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Good (72/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 37% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

72/100
Overall

Overall rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Good (72/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 37% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

72
Cushioning

Cushioning rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Excellent (90/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 87% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

90
Durability

Durability rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Very good (89/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 83% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

89
Value

Value rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Very good (87/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 80% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

87
Comfort

Comfort rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Very good (84/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 74% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

84
Appearance

Appearance rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Average (66/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 23% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

66

What runners say

“Durability issues where the heel enters the shoe—it's almost like the dog was chewing on it.”
4/5 Full review
“With great pronation control and excellent cushioning, it feels like it's saving my knees.”
4/5 Full review
“Some premature outer sole wear in the ball of the foot at around 300-350 miles.”
Tim L 4/5 Full review
“The toe box is slimmer than the original GT-2000 5 series.”
4/5 Full review
“One pair lasts hundreds of miles.”
5/5 Full review
“The tongue is also not excessively padded and holds its place very well.”
Tim L 4/5 Full review
“Last two pairs have torn on the inside by the Achilles.”
5/5 Full review
“They are adequately cushioned, but not overly so.”
Tim L 4/5 Full review
“The value for these shoes is excellent.”
Tim L 4/5 Full review

Prefer this shoe over another

47% 8/17

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Reviewers rate this shoe better than the GT-2000 4.

Reader Ratings

8 reader ratings
5/5
5
4/5
3
3/5
0
2/5
0
1/5
0

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 6–8 of 8 written reviews

Asics GT-2000 5 Review

Tim L · Feb 7, 2018

4/5

Overall

As a 51 year old runner in the Houston area, there are several months out of the year here that are extremely tough on shoes. Couple that with being a fairly heavy sweater and the strain on running shoe durability is pushed. As an every day trainer for the road, this shoe holds up reasonably well. I am a mild pronator with a midfoot strike. I have always run in the Asics GT series, going back to the 21xx series before that over the past couple of decades. I have no injury or biomechanical issues that I would attribute to the shoes. They are adequately cushioned, but not overly so. The tongue is also not excessively padded and holds its place very well. Previous models would start to see some wear through the upper in the big toe area, but with four different pair of the 5s, I have not seen this at all. The color schemes are okay for me; I don't get too wrapped up in aesthetics, though they did seem to trend towards darker colors in this model. Compared to the newly arriving model 6s, which look horrendous to me, I appreciate the mix that you can find on most of the model 5s. I rotate through three pair in the summer as I will pretty much sweatlog a shoe in any run here longer than 30-40 minutes. Weekly mileage is 40-50 miles. I typically put on about 400 miles per pair. One thing I have noticed with the model 5s is some premature outer sole wear in the ball of the foot at around 300-350 miles. I have not noticed this in previous models. The sock liner wears pretty well considering how much sweat they take in and the strain placed on them. I remove the insoles after each run (year 'round) to allow both them and the shoes to completely air out and decompress. I have never used an off-the-shelf insole and the stock version seems to hold up well. They do tend to swell over time, probably from accumulation of salts from absorbing sweat. I literally will ring them out after most of my summer runs here, but there's only so much one can do. I think the value for these shoes is excellent and runners younger than myself, and in less harsh climates, could extract more mileage out of these. Just keep an eye on the outer sole though. I will admit that I do not purchase these from a local running store, mainly because I've run in these models for so long, there's no need to mess with that. So the value is further increased through online purchase, though I always advocate people, especially new runners, visiting their LRS.
Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
4/5

Old Standby

Anonymous runner · Feb 6, 2018

5/5

Overall

I haven't worn a different brand of running shoe in 30 years nor do I plan to. This model had a rough spot for a couple around the 2000-2, but really like this one. Although my last two pairs have torn on the inside by the achilles. Seems odd. Kept running on them and seemed fine.
Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
5/5

Reader review

Anonymous runner · Jan 21, 2018

4/5

Overall

Comfy, but ugly imo.
Comfort
5/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
3/5
Value
5/5

Where to buy

We may earn a commission on these links. It never affects our ratings.

No offers available

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from ASICS

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Newest
Lightest / Lowest price / Best overall
Shoe properties
Type
Trail
Daily trainer
Trail
Pronation
Stability
Stability
Neutral
Weight
11 oz M
9.1 oz M
8.6 oz M Lightest
Stack
36/28mm
37/32mm
Drop
1mm
8mm
5mm
Release
2017 Q1
2025 Q3 Newest
2024 Q2
MSRP
$120
$160
$155
Best price
$109.96
$79.88 Lowest price
Ratings
Overall
Below average (37%)
Bottom tier (7%)
Excellent (97%) Best overall
Comfort
Good (74%)
Below average (37%)
Very good (86%) Best comfort
Cushioning
Very good (87%)
Average (41%)
Excellent (97%) Best cushioning
Durability
Very good (83%)
Above average (70%)
Very good (86%) Best durability
Appearance
Below average (23%)
Bottom tier (2%)
Good (77%) Best appearance
Value
Good (80%)
Average (51%)
Very good (87%) Best value
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.