Brooks Ariel GTS
Every version of the Ariel GTS we track, compared on ratings, specs and current price.
The line's rating is the median Better Shoes Rating of its five most recent rated versions. The median product line rates 76, and the Ariel GTS rates above 75% of the lines we track.
Rating by version, oldest first
Each dot is one version of the Ariel GTS, placed by its rating and release year.
Release year
See our analysis of whether a new version is usually as good as the one it replaces.
| Version | Released | Weight | Stack | Rating | Change | Reviews | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brooks Ariel GTS 26 In stock | 2026 | 11.1 oz (women's) | — | 81 | 0 | — | $161 |
| Brooks Ariel GTS 24 | 2024 | 11.2 oz | 36/24mm stack · 12mm drop | 81 | +3 | — | $160 MSRP |
| Brooks Ariel GTS 23 | 2023 | 10.7 oz (women's) | 26/14mm stack · 12mm drop | 79 | — | 1 | $160 MSRP |
3 shoes
Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.
-
Brooks
Ariel GTS 2681 81 Good Good Good Confidence 7
v26 (2026) · Daily trainer · Stability · 11.1 oz (women's)
$161 $170 Buy now ↗ As of Oct 22, 8:37 AM UTCOverall81Confidence7Buy it now
Other retailers
Running Warehouse $170Dick's $170MSRP $170
We share affiliate links. Learn more.
Cons
It is much heavier than the typical daily trainer for sale.
It costs much more than the typical daily trainer for sale.
-
Brooks
Ariel GTS 2481 81 Good Good Good Confidence 42
v24 (2024) · Daily trainer · Stability · 11.2 oz · 36mm stack · 12mm drop
MSRP $160
Overall81Confidence42Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
-
Brooks
Ariel GTS 2379 79 Decent Decent Decent 2 reviews Confidence 60
v23 (2023) · Daily trainer · Stability · 10.7 oz (women's) · 26mm stack · 12mm drop
Both reviewers so far rate value 5 out of 5.
Durability 82MSRP $160
Overall79Value86Durability82Cushioning79Comfort77Appearance69Confidence60Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
Pros
Both reviewers so far rate value 5 out of 5.
It weighs 10.7 oz in the women's version.
Cons
Reviewers rate appearance 3.0 out of 5, its lowest dimension.
One of two reviewers so far says replacing it twice a year gets expensive.