Altra Lone Peak 3.5

Name: Altra Lone Peak 3.5
Brand: Altra

Trail shoe · Neutral · Trail · 9.7 oz

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The Altra Lone Peak 3.0 replaced it

How it ranks

The Altra Lone Peak 3.5’s rating is an early estimate. We’ve collected 2 runner reviews so far, with product line history also informing the score.

Current estimate: Below average

Overall

Below average 64

Durability

Decent 71

Comfort

Decent 71

Appearance

Below average 67

Value

Below average 62

Cushioning

Bottom-tier 54

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

68 Moderate

Moderate 68

Based on

The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.

Product line track record
Our ratings
External ratings

Prefer this shoe over another

50% 2/4

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.

Pros

One reviewer at about 260 miles reports very little wear.
Both reviewers like the cushioning at first, one finding it enough to shield from rocks and roots.
It lists at $120, below the $170 median for trail shoes for sale.

Cons

One reviewer found the cushioning dead before 100 miles.
One reviewer found the fit sloppy, with the foot sliding around on descents.
It is the lowest-scoring Lone Peak version on record, with the 4.0 at 88 on six reviews and the 7 at 94 on sixteen.

Lone Peak 3.5 rates 64. This shoe has moderate confidence. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the Altra Lone Peak

Each dot is one version of the Lone Peak, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

40 60 80 100

66 2015 65 2017 74 2018 75 2021 78 2022 84 2023 76 2024 79 2025 68 2014 67 2016 64 2017 68 2019

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.

Lone Peak 4.5

2019 · 3 reviews

68 Below average

74 Confidence
Lone Peak 3.5 This shoe

2017 · 2 reviews

64 Below average

68 Confidence
Lone Peak 2.5

2016 · 1 review

67 Below average

53 Confidence
Lone Peak 1.5

2014 · 2 reviews

68 Below average

61 Confidence
Lone Peak 9

2025 · 4 reviews

79 Decent

72 Confidence
Lone Peak 8

2024 · 6 reviews

76 Decent

79 Confidence
Lone Peak 7

2023 · 16 reviews

84 Good

86 Confidence
Lone Peak 6

2022 · 4 reviews

78 Decent

73 Confidence
Lone Peak 5

2021 · 0 reviews

75 Decent

71 Confidence
Lone Peak 4.0

2018 · 6 reviews

74 Decent

84 Confidence
Lone Peak 3.0

2017 · 1 review

65 Below average

69 Confidence
Lone Peak 2.0

2015 · 3 reviews

66 Below average

74 Confidence

Runner Ratings

2 ratings

5/5 0

4/5 0

3/5 2

2/5 0

1/5 0

See written reviews Write a review

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight: 9.7 oz
Men's / women's: Men's 10.2 oz · Women's 9.2 oz
Release: 2017 Q3
MSRP: $120

Runner reviews

Write a review

Lone peak - self fulfilling prophecy

3/5

Overall

Tried shoes on, felt comfortable and cushioning was really nice. Ran up a peak and back down it. That will be the lone peak that I run up in them (alright on the flats) as the shoes had a sloppy fit and downhills difficult. Very hard to lock foot down, foot sliding around in shoe. Sizing seemed slightly shirt and toes bumping into the front. So for me, these are good shoes for non-technical / non-steep trails. Cushioning was plush and enjoyed that part of it.

Hrshrs · Apr 7, 2018

30 mpw training for ultramarathons came from the New Balance Fresh Foam Gobi V2

Comfort: 3/5
Cushioning: 4/5
Durability: 4/5
Appearance: 4/5
Value: 3/5

Altra Lone Peak 3.5

3/5

Overall

On first runs, I loved this shoe. It gripped the trail well, the cushioning was plenty to shield from small rocks and roots and whatever else the trail was throwing at me. The fit was roomy enough (though not quite what I was hoping for). However, as time wore on, it became clear that this is not a great long-distance trail shoe. The cushioning started to feel dead before 100 miles and with it the overall sense of comfort. After pushing past the 13 mile mark on training runs, however, it became clear that this is not a shoe for trail ultras, which is why I had purchased it (and I will say that this may have to do with my weight 175 lbs). Over time (I now have about 260 miles on them), the above holds true. Aside from the lack of cushioning, they show very little wear and will make great hiking shoes in their retirement. A few other notes: They are heavy and hot. The heaviness didn't bother me, but for summer running, expect your shoes to be soaked with sweat if you live anywhere humid. Also, I know many have complained about sizing issues. Mine fit true to size, but required some fiddling with laces (and my take is that the enormous amount of padding in the heal initially pushes the foot forward in the shoe).

joshaxel · Feb 6, 2018

50 mpw training for ultramarathons came from the Nike Zoom Terra Kiger 4