Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

ASICS GT-2000 6

Daily trainer · Stability · Road · 9.8 oz · 10mm drop

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The ASICS GT-2000 8 replaced it

How it ranks

The ASICS GT-2000 6 trails most daily trainers in our data. Cushioning and durability are its strongest sub-ratings. Looks scores well below its other sub-ratings. The rating is based on 14 runner reviews and 14 other rated shoes in the GT-2000 product line.

ASICS GT-2000 6

of 5

Below average

65
Overall
65
Cushioning
71
Durability
70
Comfort
62
Value
61
Appearance
58
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

94 High

94

Based on

The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.

  1. Product line track record
  2. Our ratings
  3. External ratings

What runners say

“Significantly tightening/stiffening/narrowing/raising the heel—pinches achilles on and off the run.”
1/5 Full review 30 mpw training for a marathon came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“Within a week they essentially turned into sandals.”
3/5 Full review 40 mpw training for middle distance came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“The shoe caused achilles tendonitis that put me on the sidelines for 3 months.”
1/5 Full review 30 mpw training for a marathon came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“Barely able to get 300–400 miles out of a pair.”
4/5 Full review 60 mpw training for a marathon came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“The fabric near the toe is thin and eventually develops holes in it.”
3/5 Full review 40 mpw training for middle distance came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“Breaks down earlier than some other shoes—even earlier GT-2000 models.”
5/5 Full review 50 mpw came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“They've gotten lighter over the years but show wear more quickly.”
4/5 Full review 100 mpw training for a half marathon came from the ASICS GEL-Kayano 17
“After always getting nagging blisters with other brands, switched to these and never went back.”
5/5 Full review 50 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Brooks Ravenna 6
“Knee and achilles problems don't rear their ugly head near as often when wearing these.”
4/5 Full review 20 mpw
“With flat feet and heel strike, these shoes compensate well.”
4/5 Full review 100 mpw training for a half marathon came from the ASICS GEL-Kayano 17
“Never had issues with pinkie-rubbing on the outside.”
5/5 Full review 50 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Brooks Ravenna 6
“Sizing problems and lack of durability have been the biggest issues.”
4/5 Full review 60 mpw training for a marathon came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“Comfortable and supportive enough for moderate support needs.”
5/5 Full review 50 mpw came from the ASICS GT-2000 5
“Great cushioning and very comfortable.”
3/5 Full review 40 mpw training for middle distance came from the ASICS GT-2000 5

Prefer this shoe over another

35% 8/23

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.


Pros

  • Cushioning draws 4.6 out of 5, the highest mark of any dimension, and reviewers praise it even when unhappy elsewhere.
  • Long-time GT-2000 wearers say the stability suits them, several having run the line for ten years or more.

Cons

  • Value draws 3.6 out of 5 across fourteen reviewers, the lowest mark of any dimension.
  • Several reviewers report the thin toe fabric holing and the midsole breaking down early, one saying a pair turned into sandals within a week.
  • One long-time ASICS runner rates it 1 out of 5, saying the 6 tightened and raised the heel enough to pinch his Achilles.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

GT-2000 6 rates 65. This shoe has high confidence. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the ASICS GT-2000

Each dot is one version of the GT-2000, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.
  • GT-2000 15

    2026 · 0 reviews

    64 Below average

    73 Confidence

  • GT-2000 14

    2025 · 4 reviews

    67 Below average

    81 Confidence

  • GT-2000 13

    2024 · 13 reviews

    71 Decent

    87 Confidence

  • GT-2000 12

    2023 · 21 reviews

    74 Decent

    90 Confidence

  • GT-2000 11

    2022 · 16 reviews

    68 Below average

    87 Confidence

  • GT-2000 10

    2021 · 9 reviews

    68 Below average

    90 Confidence

  • GT-2000 9

    2020 · 5 reviews

    65 Below average

    86 Confidence

  • GT-2000 8

    2019 · 7 reviews

    58 Bottom-tier

    87 Confidence

  • GT-2000 7

    2019 · 14 reviews

    71 Decent

    92 Confidence

  • GT-2000 6 This shoe

    2017 · 14 reviews

    65 Below average

    94 Confidence

  • GT-2000 5

    2017 · 8 reviews

    74 Decent

    89 Confidence

  • GT-2000 4

    2016 · 3 reviews

    61 Below average

    86 Confidence

  • GT-2000 3

    2015 · 15 reviews

    50 Bottom-tier

    92 Confidence

  • GT-2000 2

    2014 · 59 reviews

    53 Bottom-tier

    99 Confidence

  • GT-2000 1

    2013 · 46 reviews

    51 Bottom-tier

    97 Confidence

Runner Ratings

14 ratings
5/5 6
4/5 6
3/5 1
2/5 0
1/5 1

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
9.8 oz
Men's / women's
Men's 10.7 oz · Women's 8.9 oz
Release
2017 Q4
MSRP
$130
Drop
10mm

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 1–5 of 14 written reviews

4/5

Overall

nihiladrem · Aug 16, 2019

70 mpw training for a marathon came from the Saucony Guide 10

Comfort
4/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
3/5
Value
5/5

Asics 2000

5/5

Overall

Been wearing these for over 10 years. Love them. Get a new pair every year.

Anonymous runner · Aug 14, 2019

15 mpw training for a half marathon

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
5/5

4/5

Overall

Anonymous runner · Aug 13, 2019

20 mpw training for a half marathon

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
3/5

Frustrated with GT2000s

4/5

Overall

I've worn every version of this shoe since it came out back in the 90's and the last few versions have not been great. Sizing problems and lack of durability have been the biggest issues. With these shoes I'm barely able to get 300-400 miles out of a pair.

Anonymous runner · Aug 13, 2019

60 mpw training for a marathon came from the ASICS GT-2000 5

Comfort
4/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
2/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
2/5

4/5

Overall

Anonymous runner · Aug 10, 2019

20 mpw training for a half marathon came from the ASICS GEL-Kayano 5 360

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
5/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from ASICS

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Lightest / Newest
Lowest price / Best overall / Best comfort
Shoe properties
Type
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Pronation
Stability
Stability
Neutral
Weight
9.8 oz
8.3 oz Lightest
9.9 oz
Stack
—
37/29mm
40/35mm
Drop
10mm
8mm
4mm
Release
2017 Q4
2026 Newest
2022 Q3
MSRP
$130
—
$165
Best price
—
$150
$95 Lowest price
Ratings
Overall
65 Below average
64 Below average
99 Exceptional Best overall
Comfort
62 Below average
63 Below average
99 Exceptional Best comfort
Cushioning
71 Decent
68 Below average
99 Exceptional Best cushioning
Durability
70 Decent
72 Decent
97 Exceptional Best durability
Appearance
58 Bottom-tier
58 Bottom-tier
75 Decent Best appearance
Value
61 Below average
73 Decent
77 Decent Best value rating
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.