Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

New Balance Vazee 2090

Daily trainer · Neutral · Road · 8.6 oz · 26/20mm stack · 6mm drop

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock.

How it ranks

The New Balance Vazee 2090’s rating is an early estimate. We’ve collected 1 runner review so far, with brand history also informing the score.

New Balance Vazee 2090

of 5

Current estimate: Below average

66
Overall
66
Appearance
77
Value
73
Durability
67
Comfort
64
Cushioning
54
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

Confidence

12 Very low

12

Based on

The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.

  1. Brand rating
  2. Our ratings
  3. External ratings

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.


Pros

  • One reviewer finds it fine for road runs and tempo work on the track.
  • The same reviewer calls it fairly light with a breathable upper, and says the outsole wears down slowly.

Cons

  • That reviewer says it is not a good shoe for trail running.
  • They also find it stiff and somewhat narrow, and rate comfort, cushioning and durability 3 out of 5.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

Vazee 2090 rates 66. This shoe has very low confidence. See how we rate shoes.

Runner Ratings

1 rating
5/5 0
4/5 1
3/5 0
2/5 0
1/5 0

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
8.6 oz
Men's / women's
Men's 9.1 oz · Women's 8.1 oz
Release
2017 Q3
MSRP
$150
Stack
26/20mm
Drop
6mm

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 1–1 of 1 written review

Vazee 2090

4/5

Overall

I've had a bad experience while running in this shoe, though I don't know if it is entirely to do with the shoe. I developed shin pain and had to take significant time off of running. I don't credit that entirely to the shoe but changing from the previous model I wore, I noticed a few things about the shoe that stood out. The shoe is pretty stiff and somewhat narrow. It is not a great shoe for trail running,but is okay for the roads and tempo work on the track. It is fairly light. The upper is breathable. The bottom of the shoe wears down kind of slow, which is nice. This is a decent shoe, but I'm going to be exploring other options with my next running shoe.

Anonymous runner · Apr 25, 2018

70 mpw training for a half marathon came from the New Balance 870 v4

Comfort
3/5
Cushioning
3/5
Durability
3/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
4/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from New Balance

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Lowest price / Best overall / Best cushioning
Lightest / Newest / Best appearance
Shoe properties
Type
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Pronation
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Weight
8.6 oz
9.9 oz
8.0 oz Lightest
Stack
26/20mm
40/35mm
38/33mm
Drop
6mm
4mm
5mm
Release
2017 Q3
2022 Q3
2023 Q1 Newest
MSRP
$150
$165
$145
Best price
—
$95 Lowest price
$170
Ratings
Overall
66 Below average
99 Exceptional Best overall
98 Exceptional
Comfort
64 Below average
99 Exceptional
99 Exceptional
Cushioning
54 Bottom-tier
99 Exceptional Best cushioning
98 Exceptional
Durability
67 Below average
97 Exceptional Best durability
87 Good
Appearance
77 Decent
75 Decent
86 Good Best appearance
Value
73 Decent
77 Decent
83 Good Best value rating
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.