Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

Nike Zoom JA Fly 3

Track spike · Neutral · Road · 6.0 oz

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The Nike Zoom Ja Fly 4 replaced it

How it ranks

The Nike Zoom JA Fly 3’s rating is an early estimate. We’ve collected 1 runner review so far, with brand history also informing the score.

Current estimate: Below average

68
Overall
68
Appearance
83
Value
69
Comfort
69
Cushioning
68
Durability
64
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

27 Very low

27

Based on

The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.

  1. Brand rating
  2. Our ratings
  3. External ratings

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.


Pros

  • At 6.0 oz for both sexes, light even for a spike.
  • The one reviewer so far rates comfort and cushioning 5 out of 5.

Cons

  • Value draws 3 out of 5 in the single review so far, the lowest mark of any dimension.
  • That reviewer found it ran small.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

Zoom JA Fly 3 rates 68. This shoe has very low confidence. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the Nike Zoom JA Fly

Each dot is one version of the Zoom JA Fly, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.
  • Zoom Ja Fly 4

    2025 · 3 reviews

    83 Good

    35 Confidence

  • Zoom JA Fly 3 This shoe

    2018 · 1 review

    68 Below average

    27 Confidence

Runner Ratings

1 rating
5/5 0
4/5 1
3/5 0
2/5 0
1/5 0

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
6.0 oz
Men's / women's
Men's 6.0 oz · Women's 6.0 oz
Release
2018 Q1
MSRP
$125

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 1–1 of 1 written review

Find them on Sale

4/5

Overall

I attended a technical symposium on research in shoe cushioning and other factors leading to "the sub 2 hour marathon," and the researchers presented data on shock absorption in the most recent shoes from Nike, Adidas, etc. It had been a few years since I kept close attention on these technical details, as I have been sidelined from actual running until 2 years ago (chronic knee pain/worn out knees from over 140,000 total running/racing miles including more than 130 official marathon finishes and another 50+ ultras from 50k to 100 miles). Now that I am back to (pathetically slow) actual jogging again, these results of BETTER cushioning are even more important. The data presented were compelling for the newest combination of super cushioning foam AND the carbon fiber "spring plate." I found these Zoom Fly shoes (MSRP $150) on sale at $60 both at the Nike Outlet nearby and at some of the brick and mortar traditional sales points. I now have 3 pair! The feel on footplant is clearly superior in terms of protection. I do have a "shoe fetish" from many years as a free shoe recipient over 30 years ago writing for "Running" when it was a low-key publication out of Oregon. Later I also contributed equipment reviews for the Sacramento Bee. Anyway, now in my advanced senior years, I still enjoy new running shoes, even while paying for them myself. These Nike Zoom Fly models are my "go to" choice for my efforts at quicker (for me) workouts. The only niggle on the shoe is the very lightweight upper with no "toe wear protection" area has already been abraded within the first 50 miles or so of use. I have used superglue and duct tape inside to protect this from further degrading. I have also pulled out the insoles and built up the arch support to a higher level, as I have high arched feet and this modification helps distribute impact force better over the whole mid-foot and reduces pressure on the metatarsals. Sole wear seems quite good so far, and basically I am MUCH IMPRESSED with this tech. (Note: I also have Adidas Boost shoes (2 different models), NB Soft Foam and Puma which appear/feel to be similarly cushioning, along with a recent addition of an Under Armor tech shoe that felt similar in the store (and was on big discount sale pricing))

George 2:41 · Jul 2, 2019

45 mpw training for a half marathon

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
3/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from Nike

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Newest / Lowest price
Lightest / Best overall / Best comfort
Shoe properties
Type
Track spike
Track spike
Track spike
Pronation
Neutral
Stability
Stability
Weight
6.0 oz
4.9 oz (men's)
4.6 oz Lightest
Stack
—
—
—
Drop
—
—
—
Release
2018 Q1
2025 Newest
2024 Q2
MSRP
$125
$125
$170
Best price
—
$75 Lowest price
$110
Ratings
Overall
68 Below average
83 Good
97 Exceptional Best overall
Comfort
69 Below average
66 Below average
93 Excellent Best comfort
Cushioning
68 Below average
64 Below average
84 Good Best cushioning
Durability
64 Below average
66 Below average
86 Good Best durability
Appearance
83 Good
84 Good
98 Exceptional Best appearance
Value
69 Below average
73 Decent
95 Excellent Best value rating
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.