Mizuno Neo Vista
Every version of the Neo Vista we track, compared on ratings, specs and current price.
The score is the median Better Shoes Rating of the line's shoes, out of 100. The average product line scores 76, and the Neo Vista scores above 80% of the lines we track.
Rating by version, oldest first
Each dot is one version of the Neo Vista, placed by its rating and release year.
Release year
See our analysis of whether a new version is usually as good as the one it replaces.
| Version | Released | Weight | Stack | Score | Change | Reviews | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mizuno Neo Vista 3 In stock | 2026 | — | — | 81 | -6 | — | — |
| Mizuno Neo Vista 2 In stock | 2025 | — | 7mm drop | 86 | -6 | 1 | — |
| Mizuno Neo Vista | 2024 | 7.7 oz (men's) | 53/45mm · 8mm drop | 92 | — | 5 | $180 MSRP |
3 shoes
Prices updated daily. Last checked Sep 14.
-
$140 Buy now ↗ As of Sep 14, 8:37 AM UTCOverall81Confidence10Cons
The Neo Vista and Neo Vista 2 before it score 93 and 85, on six and two reviews.
-
Mizuno
Neo Vista 286 Good Good · 2 reviews · Confidence 53/100
v2 (2025) · Speed / workouts · Neutral · 7mm drop
Both reviewers so far rate comfort and cushioning 5 out of 5.
Durability 74Overall86Cushioning92Comfort91Durability74Appearance69Value63Confidence53Buy it now
We share affiliate links. Learn more.
Pros
Both reviewers so far rate comfort and cushioning 5 out of 5.
Cons
One reviewer who heel strikes says the cushioning does not last past 200 miles.
Value draws 3.0 out of 5 in the two reviews so far, the lowest mark of any dimension.
Scores in the Neo Vista line have fallen from 93 for the original to 85 for this version.
-
Mizuno
Neo Vista92 Very good Very good · 6 reviews · Confidence 76/100
v1 (2024) · Racing · Neutral · 7.7 oz (men's) · 8mm drop
A 53mm heel stack at 7.7 oz, cushioning without much weight.
Durability 73MSRP $180
Overall92Comfort96Cushioning95Durability73Value71Appearance60Confidence76Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
Pros
A 53mm heel stack at 7.7 oz, cushioning without much weight.
Two reviewers call it smooth and comfortable, with a good rocker for long runs.
Runners say the plate keeps the soft foam from feeling mushy.
Cons
Appearance is much the weakest dimension at 3.3 out of 5, and one reviewer sums it up as looking bad and feeling great.
One reviewer finds the sock-like upper snug and difficult for wider feet.
Durability averages 4.0 out of 5, and one reviewer expects it to last less than an ASICS Superblast.
