Nike Zoom Structure Triax +
Every version of the Zoom Structure Triax + we track, compared on ratings, specs and current price.
The line's rating is the median Better Shoes Rating of its five most recent rated versions. The median product line rates 75, and the Zoom Structure Triax + rates above 26% of the lines we track.
Rating by version, oldest first
Each dot is one version of the Zoom Structure Triax +, placed by its rating and release year.
Release year
See our analysis of whether a new version is usually as good as the one it replaces.
| Version | Released | Weight | Stack | Rating | Change | Reviews | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nike Zoom Structure Triax+ 14 | 2016 | — | — | 72 | +1 | — | $95 MSRP |
| Nike Zoom Structure Triax + 15 | 2014 | 12.2 oz (men's) | — | 71 | — | 2 | $100 MSRP |
2 shoes
Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 29.
-
Nike
Zoom Structure Triax+ 1472 72 Decent Decent Decent 1 review Confidence 2 Few reviews. Our runners have rated this shoe only a few times, so its rating may change.
v14 (2016) · Daily trainer · Stability
The one reviewer so far rates every dimension 5 out of 5.
Durability 70MSRP $95
Overall72Appearance89Value79Cushioning78Comfort77Durability70Confidence2Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
Pros
The one reviewer so far rates every dimension 5 out of 5.
Cons
The Zoom Structure Triax+ 15 after it scores 75 on two reviews against its 72.
-
Nike
Zoom Structure Triax + 1571 71 Decent Decent Decent 2 reviews Confidence 2 Few reviews. Our runners have rated this shoe only a few times, so its rating may change.
v15 (2014) · Daily trainer · Stability · 12.2 oz (men's)
Both reviewers praise the support, and rate comfort 4 or 5 out of 5.
Durability 66MSRP $100
Overall71Appearance87Value77Comfort77Cushioning77Durability66Confidence2Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
Pros
Both reviewers praise the support, and rate comfort 4 or 5 out of 5.
Cons
Durability is its lowest-rated dimension at 3.5 out of 5, and one reviewer says it wears down faster than ASICS.
One reviewer wishes it were more water resistant, and finds it pricier than Saucony.