ASICS GT-2000 2

Trail · Stability · 10.9 oz · 10mm drop · 30/20mm stack

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The ASICS GT-2000 3 replaced it

How it ranks

The ASICS GT-2000 2 rates in the 11th percentile overall among trail shoes. Its strongest dimension is cushioning (85th percentile); its weakest is looks (1st). Of 24 runners who came to it from another shoe, 4 preferred it to what they ran before.

Based on 59 runner reviews.

ASICS GT-2000 2

/ 1

Below average

Overall rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Below average (59/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 11% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

59/100
Overall

Overall rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Below average (59/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 11% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

59
Cushioning

Cushioning rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Very good (90/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 85% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

90
Durability

Durability rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Good (78/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 66% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

78
Value

Value rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Below average (60/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 15% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

60
Comfort

Comfort rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Below average (58/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 13% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

58
Appearance

Appearance rating

We estimate how this shoe ranks by combining runner ratings, whether reviewers say they'd buy a shoe again, and direct comparisons to other shoes they've run in. We also consider related product-line performance and trusted external ratings. More review data helps narrow the likely rating range.

Better Shoes Rating

Bottom-tier (50/100)

Compared To Other Shoes

Scores better than 1% of shoes

Compared with all shoes

The shaded band shows the rating range we think is most likely.

50

What runners say

“Put in as much as 800 miles on a pair without getting hurt or feeling any difference in comfort”
Winged Cow 4/5 Full review
“Durability is a real problem. Lucky to get 300 miles”
elrunner1 4/5 Full review
“Mesh at the toe wears out easily, big toe creates a hole after about 250 miles”
4/5 Full review
“High price was worth every penny—wouldn't be running without this shoe”
5/5 Full review
“At least 600–700 miles before needing a new pair”
RunBP 5/5 Full review
“Rarely get injured. Every time I switch brands I get injured”
lucyruns94 5/5 Full review
“Provides good support/responsiveness for high mileage runners without being too soft”
5/5 Full review
“Feels a bit less cushioned and springier than the GT-2000 1, which I definitely like”
RunDamatuRun 4/5 Full review
“Thick enough to absorb the impact from stones and other uneven objects”
4/5 Full review
“Crush the midsole after about 300 miles”
4/5 Full review

Prefer this shoe over another

54% 27/50

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Reviewers rate this shoe better than the GT-2000 3.

Cons

  • Most reviewers like this shoe less than their last shoe.

Reader Ratings

59 reader ratings
5/5
23
4/5
34
3/5
2
2/5
0
1/5
0

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 21–25 of 59 written reviews

Reader review

racinej · Apr 3, 2015

4/5

Overall

This is a standard, neutral shoe with great value. It's cushioned but not too cushioned. No frills. Gets good mileage - good up to at least 400 miles.
Comfort
5/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
3/5
Value
5/5

Reader review

Anonymous runner · Apr 3, 2015

5/5

Overall

I was a huge fan of the Asics GT-21xx series, started with the 2150s until they were discontinued. The GT-2000 has been better than expected, though not the complete same. The DuoMax section in the arch part of the GT-21xx series was great, and although the GT-2000 series has something similar, it's not quite the same. There isn't too much of a difference between the GT-2000-1 and GT-2000-2 in my eyes, but I think the initial version would win out. But they're great shoes, really stable, not flashy, and comfortable. They haven't changed enough for me to feel like I need to look for different shoes. I've avoided injury for the most part, so I don't want to fix what's not broke.
Comfort
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
4/5

Reader review

chrislips73 · Apr 3, 2015

4/5

Overall

Currently acceptable. Don't like the lower profile. Still, 20+ years in the model it is difficult to change.
Comfort
4/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
3/5

Reader review

Anonymous runner · Apr 3, 2015

5/5

Overall

Comfort
5/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
5/5

Reader review

Anonymous runner · Apr 3, 2015

4/5

Overall

First few runs are rough, but once broken in, it's great.
Comfort
4/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
4/5

Where to buy

We may earn a commission on these links. It never affects our ratings.

No offers available

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from ASICS

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Newest
Lightest / Lowest price / Best overall
Shoe properties
Type
Trail
Daily trainer
Trail
Pronation
Stability
Stability
Neutral
Weight
10.9 oz M
9.1 oz M
8.6 oz M Lightest
Stack
30/20mm
36/28mm
37/32mm
Drop
1mm
8mm
5mm
Release
2014
2025 Q3 Newest
2024 Q2
MSRP
$120
$160
$155
Best price
$109.96
$79.88 Lowest price
Ratings
Overall
Bottom tier (11%)
Bottom tier (7%)
Excellent (97%) Best overall
Comfort
Bottom tier (13%)
Below average (37%)
Very good (86%) Best comfort
Cushioning
Very good (85%)
Average (41%)
Excellent (97%) Best cushioning
Durability
Above average (66%)
Above average (70%)
Very good (86%) Best durability
Appearance
Bottom tier (1%)
Bottom tier (2%)
Good (77%) Best appearance
Value
Bottom tier (15%)
Average (51%)
Very good (87%) Best value
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.