PUMA Faas 300
Every version of the Faas 300 we track, compared on ratings, specs and current price.
The score is the median Better Shoes Rating of the line's shoes, out of 100. The average product line scores 76, and the Faas 300 scores above 0% of the lines we track.
Rating by version, oldest first
Each dot is one version of the Faas 300, placed by its rating and release year.
Release year
See our analysis of whether a new version is usually as good as the one it replaces.
| Version | Released | Weight | Stack | Score | Change | Reviews | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUMA Faas 300 v3 | 2015 | — | — | 54 | +5 | 2 | — |
| PUMA Faas 300 v2 | 2013 | 7.4 oz (men's) | — | 49 | — | 5 | $90 MSRP |
2 shoes
Prices updated daily. Last checked Sep 14.
-
PUMA
Faas 300 v354 Bottom-tier Bottom-tier · 2 reviews · Confidence 45/100
v3 (2015) · Daily trainer · Neutral
One of two reviewers so far prefers it to the Faas 250 for comfort and the upper.
Durability 56Overall54Value68Cushioning67Appearance66Comfort57Durability56Confidence45Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
Pros
One of two reviewers so far prefers it to the Faas 250 for comfort and the upper.
The Faas 300 v2 before it scores 49 on five reviews, against this version's 53.
Cons
Reviewers rate durability 3.0 out of 5, its lowest dimension.
One of two reviewers so far had the pronation control aggravate a peroneal tendon while breaking it in.
-
PUMA
Faas 300 v249 Bottom-tier Bottom-tier · 5 reviews · Confidence 70/100
v2 (2013) · Daily trainer · Neutral · 7.4 oz (men's)
At 7.4 oz it is well under the 8.9 oz median for daily trainers on sale, and two reviewers call it light with enough cushioning.
Durability 59MSRP $90
Overall49Value71Cushioning66Appearance64Durability59Comfort52Confidence70Buy it now
Not available at tracked retailers right now.
Pros
At 7.4 oz it is well under the 8.9 oz median for daily trainers on sale, and two reviewers call it light with enough cushioning.
Two reviewers praise the flexible sole across pavement, track and trail.
Reviewers rate value 4.4 out of 5, its highest dimension.
Cons
Four of five reviewers who answered report an injury while running in it.
One of five reviewers so far names durability as their only concern, while another gets 400 to 500 miles.