Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

adidas Supernova Glide 8 Boost

Daily trainer · Neutral · Road · 10.6 oz · 27/17mm stack · 10mm drop

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock.

How it ranks

The adidas Supernova Glide 8 Boost is one of the strongest daily trainers in our data. Durability and cushioning are its strongest sub-ratings. Looks scores well below its other sub-ratings. The rating is based on 11 runner reviews and 4 other rated shoes in the Supernova Glide product line.

adidas Supernova Glide 8 Boost

of 5

Good

88
Overall
88
Durability
98
Cushioning
95
Comfort
91
Value
86
Appearance
81
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

92 High

92

Based on

The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.

  1. Product line track record
  2. Our ratings
  3. External ratings

What runners say

“1000+ miles with plenty of miles still left”
5/5 Full review 30 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Vomero 10
“Boost foam retains cushioning over time much better than other foams”
5/5 Full review 95 mpw training for a marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35
“Continental rubber outsole doesn't wear out; Boost midsole doesn't break down”
5/5 Full review 30 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Vomero 10
“Runs big; go half size down”
5/5 Full review 65 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34
“Minimal wear/rubber loss on outsole after 300+ miles”
5/5 Full review 20 mpw came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32
“Upper shows only minimal wear and tear after 1000 miles”
5/5 Full review 30 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Vomero 10
“Daily trainer for 6 years”
5/5 Full review 55 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Mizuno Wave Rider 18
“Only lasts about 300-400 miles”
5/5 Full review 40 mpw training for a half marathon
“Light enough for speed; Boost foam really lowers impact”
5/5 Full review 80 mpw training for a marathon
“Get about 800 miles; uppers are amazing”
5/5 Full review 65 mpw
“After 300 miles, upper still in great shape with no tears or loose seams”
5/5 Full review 20 mpw came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32
“Boost foam concentrated under heel and mid-foot, with thin EVA layer above”
5/5 Full review 20 mpw came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32
“Cushioned enough for long runs but not bulky or heavy”
5/5 Full review 55 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Mizuno Wave Rider 18
“Lacks a certain 'snap' at faster paces”
5/5 Full review 20 mpw came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32
“Could benefit from more lace holes for snugger toe box”
5/5 Full review 65 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34
“V1 pair lasts longer than V2”
5/5 Full review 20 mpw came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32
“Older models available for $70-$90”
5/5 Full review 95 mpw training for a marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35

Prefer this shoe over another

37% 7/19

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.


Pros

  • Reviewers report very high mileage from the Boost midsole and the outsole.
  • Reviewers find it cushioned for long runs yet responsive enough to pick up pace.
  • Runners praise the even, comfortable fit and the well-padded upper.

Cons

  • At 11.6 oz, two reviewers say it lacks snap at faster paces.
  • Durability is uneven, with one reviewer getting only 300 to 400 miles and another finding the later outsole version wears much faster than the first.
  • Appearance averages 4.3 out of 5, and one reviewer calls the design bland.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

Supernova Glide 8 Boost rates 88. This shoe has high confidence. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the adidas Supernova Glide

Each dot is one version of the Supernova Glide, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.

Runner Ratings

11 ratings
5/5 10
4/5 1
3/5 0
2/5 0
1/5 0

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
10.6 oz
Men's / women's
Men's 11.6 oz · Women's 9.6 oz
Release
2016 Q3
MSRP
$130
Stack
27/17mm
Drop
10mm

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 11–11 of 11 written reviews

An ideal 'do-everything' shoe

5/5

Overall

The Adidas Glide 8 shoe lives up to its reputation as a versatile, comfortable, durable running shoe suited for all manner of training runs and races. Across the board, the Glide 8 exceeds expectations for a mid-tier shoe, and is of the same visual and material quality as the highest-priced shoes in the Adidas range - as such it offers tremendous value for money, particularly for a beginner or low-mileage runner looking for one pair to rule them all. Ride quality and cushioning: The Glide 8 strikes a good balance between plushness and firmness underfoot - the Boost foam is the primary cushioning material, and it is concentrated under the heel and mid-foot, with a thin EVA layer above. The Boost layer tapers towards the forefoot and toe, and the last inch or so is primarily the traditional EVA foam - this helps the shoe in transition as the softness and springiness in the heel and midfoot cushions initial impact while the firmer forefoot aids in pushing off. Therefore although the shoe feels heavier than some other training models and has a substantial wedge of cushioning, on the run it is responsive and feels fairly quick. Compared to a Nike Pegasus 32 (my other primary training shoe), there is more of a 'spring' quality to the cushioning, which is the benefit of the Boost foam over Nike's more traditional foam-and-Zoom construction. However, the shoe lacks a certain 'snap' at faster paces - the Peagsus, by contrast, is firmer all-around and so feels quicker at tempo/interval paces. Please note, there are two versions of the Glide 8 out there - the initial launch version (which I have in the Bold Orange/White/Black colourway) most notably has a Continental-branded outsole rubber, whereas the latter version (in Core Black/White/Metallic and other revised colours) has a non-branded outsole rubber. The first version, with the Continental rubber, is significantly more durable than the second - after over 300 miles there has been minimal wear/rubber loss on the outsole of my V1 pair, but I have seen some loss of tread etc. on my V2 pair after only 100 miles or so. If you can find them, get the V1 pair as you will find they will last longer. Upper and fit: The Glide 8 has a high-level of step-in comfort, owing to the combination of plush Boost foam in the midsole, a thick blown-foam insole (removable if you prefer to use a different insole), and the generous use of soft textiles in the upper. The overall fit is accurate to Adidas's sizing, and is wonderfully even and comfortable. The heel counter is fairly stiff and holds the heel comfortably and securely, although the lining fabric has a somewhat smooth texture which may give the feeling of heel slippage if not laced properly. The collar is plush, as are the tongue and internal lining, and there are no irritating seams or other internal elements that might cause blisters or hot spots. The lacing connects to synthetic panels bearing the classic three stripes on the medial and lateral sides - this provides a feeling of stability to the fit, and along with the plush tongue create a smooth distribution of lacing pressure across the midfoot. Durability: As noted above, I own both versions of the Glide 8, and apart from the differing outsole materials and the corresponding effect on durability, they are of identical build quality and material quality. After 300 miles on one pair, the upper is still in great shape, with no tears, loose seams etc. Likewise, there has been no noticeable decline in cushioning quality over this time - this extremely long lifespan is probably the key advantage of the Adidas Boost foam. As one would expect, the blown-foam insole has worn in, but still retains some plushness and does its job well. Overall: In summary, the Adidas Glide 8 is a fantastic, well-rounded shoe suitable for almost any runner and any type of run. Although it has recently been replaced in the Adidas line-up by the Supernova, the Glide 8 can still be found in running shops and all over the internet - as such it can be found at discounted prices, which further increases the value for money you get from the shoe. I'd definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a new multi-use or or training shoe for the new season.

Anonymous runner · Jan 3, 2018

20 mpw came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32

Comfort
5/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
5/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from adidas

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Best durability / Best appearance / Best value rating
Lightest / Newest / Best overall
Shoe properties
Type
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Pronation
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Weight
10.6 oz
—
9.9 oz Lightest
Stack
27/17mm
—
40/35mm
Drop
10mm
—
4mm
Release
2016 Q3
2016
2022 Q3 Newest
MSRP
$130 Lower MSRP
—
$165
Best price
—
—
$95
Ratings
Overall
88 Good
—
99 Exceptional Best overall
Comfort
91 Very good
—
99 Exceptional Best comfort
Cushioning
95 Excellent
—
99 Exceptional Best cushioning
Durability
98 Exceptional Best durability
—
97 Exceptional
Appearance
81 Good Best appearance
—
75 Decent
Value
86 Good Best value rating
—
77 Decent
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.