Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

adidas Solar Glide ST

Daily trainer · Stability · Road · 11.2 oz

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The adidas Solar Glide ST 19 replaced it

How it ranks

The adidas Solar Glide ST trails most daily trainers in our data. Durability and cushioning are its strongest sub-ratings. The rating rests on 4 runner reviews and 1 other rated shoe in the Solar Glide ST product line. Another 8 reviews would set the confidence on this shoe's own reviews.

adidas Solar Glide ST

of 5

Bottom-tier

55/100
Overall
55
Durability
81
Cushioning
77
Appearance
75
Comfort
56
Value
52
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence will score low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

30/100

30

What runners say

“Anything faster than a jog feels clonky in these shoes”
4/5 Full review 90 mpw training for a half marathon came from the New Balance Fresh Foam Vongo v4
“The shoe is way too heavy for short races or speed work but for recovery and long runs the ride is great”
4/5 Full review 30 mpw came from the HOKA Arahi v1
“Leaves nothing but fabric over the achilles. Makes for a comfier fit but I've found the durability of the material on the inside there to be terrible”
4/5 Full review 70 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Structure 22
“The guide rails on the sides can be a bit obtrusive to get used to but do seem to stabilize the foot well without feeling a hard medial post”
4/5 Full review 30 mpw came from the HOKA Arahi v1
“Far less bulky than the Supernova ST, the Solar Glide ST has a superior fit with a wider toe box”
4/5 Full review 70 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Structure 22
“Heel counter cut out is great, I have felt no pressure on my achilles”
4/5 Full review 30 mpw came from the HOKA Arahi v1
“I have about 275 miles on my pair and have not worn through the rubber but it is awfully close in places”
4/5 Full review 30 mpw came from the HOKA Arahi v1
“I was getting pains in my arch and along the top of my foot if I tried running any further with them”
3/5 Full review 10 mpw came from the ASICS GT-1000 7
“The continental rubber wears down pretty quickly”
4/5 Full review 30 mpw came from the HOKA Arahi v1
“It will last 500+ miles without losing any assets”
4/5 Full review 90 mpw training for a half marathon came from the New Balance Fresh Foam Vongo v4

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Sep 14.


Pros

  • Reviewers rate cushioning 4.5 out of 5, and two use it for slow and recovery running.
  • One of four reviewers so far calls it the best adidas stability shoe to date.

Cons

  • Averaging 10.5 oz across the men's and women's builds, it is well above the 8.9 oz median for daily trainers on sale, and one reviewer calls it heavy.
  • Reviewers rate value 3.3 out of 5, its lowest dimension, and it lists at $150, matching the daily median.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

Solar Glide ST rates 55. This shoe has very low certainty. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the adidas Solar Glide ST

Each dot is one version of the Solar Glide ST, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.
  • Solar Glide ST 19

    2019 · 1 review

    69 Below average

    3 Confidence

  • Solar Glide ST This shoe

    2018 · 4 reviews

    55 Bottom-tier

    30 Confidence

Reader Ratings

4 ratings
5/5 0
4/5 3
3/5 1
2/5 0
1/5 0

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
11.2 oz
Release
2018 Q2
MSRP
$150

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 1–4 of 4 written reviews

Great for going slow

4/5

Overall

The Adidas SolarGlide ST is the ideal shoe for those post-workout recovery runs where the pace feels just above walking. It’s perfect for a nice Saturday shuffle, between the hard Friday track session and the up-tempo Sunday long run. It is not, however, made for smooth cruising at a relatively brisk pace. Anything faster than a jog feels clonky in these shoes. Maybe that’s not a word, but you get it. Forget about post-run strides or an easy workout in this shoe. On the bright side, it will last 500+ miles without losing any assets! A truly well-built shoe, er, brick.

Anonymous runner · Jan 27, 2020

90 mpw training for a half marathon came from the New Balance Fresh Foam Vongo v4

Comfort
4/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
5/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
3/5

Very good overall trainer. Though it is heavy and a little expensive.

4/5

Overall

This was my first experience with a Boost running shoe and I have truly enjoyed it. Upper: - Very soft mesh that is comfortable. It is a little warm for hot summer runs and seems to hold water more than others - Heel counter cut out is great, I have felt no pressure on my achillies - Tongue is nicely padded Ride/Midsole: - I had no experience with Boost until this shoe but it is great - The Boost/EVA combo gives a plush ride with a reasonable amount of energy return - The shoes is way too heavy for short races or speed work but for recovery and long runs the ride is great - The guide rails on the sides can be a bit obtrusive to get used to but do seem to stabilize the foot well without feeling a hard medial post. After 20 miles or so I did not notice the guide rails anymore. Outsole: - This is the downside to me. The continental rubber wears down pretty quickly - I have about 275 miles on my pair and have not worn through the rubber but it is awfully close in places. - Traction is not bad even when worn down but I wouldn't say it is great either. Price: - $140 at the time of this review - While not outrageous when compared to the market it seems high for a shoe that has largely been the same for a couple of years.

Anonymous runner · Sep 25, 2019

30 mpw came from the HOKA Arahi v1

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
3/5

Not convinced they’re good for me.

3/5

Overall

Having bought the same road running shoes for years after an initial fitting at a specialist store, I decided it was time to return and get properly fitted there again, just in case my running style had evolved. It hadn’t really, but I took the opportunity to switch my ASICS which I loved for this Adidas pair, mainly as they were on offer and I quite liked the look of them. The first few times I wore them I just did short distances - no more than 5 miles. But I noticed that I was getting pains in my arch and along the top of my foot if I tried running any further with them. I’m usually an off road runner and wear Brooks for that, but I’m afraid that these Adidas shoes are not exactly encouraging me to clock up more road miles.

abauld · Jul 26, 2019

10 mpw came from the ASICS GT-1000 7

Comfort
3/5
Cushioning
3/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
3/5

Best Adidas stability shoe to date

4/5

Overall

The Boost era continues. Nothing like it when it comes to the combination of durability, cushion, and responsiveness. Like the rest of the Solar series, there's a generous amount of it underfoot. Far less bulky than the Supernova ST, the Solar Glide ST has a superior fit with a wider toe box and engineered mesh upper that moves with the foot in ways that the old models couldn't. The heel counter echoes what we see out of Ultra Boost - leaves nothing but fabric over the achilles. Makes for a comfier fit but I've found the durability of the material on the inside there to be terrible. After 80-something miles, it's almost shredded. The biggest downside to an otherwise great stability update by Adidas. Would recommend for those that like more a cushioned shoe without a stability post (they use "Energized Boost" on the medial side instead) and like a sleek fit.

cutrack · Sep 30, 2018

70 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Structure 22

Comfort
4/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
4/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from adidas

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Lightest / Newest / Best overall
Shoe properties
Type
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Daily trainer
Pronation
Stability
Stability
Neutral
Weight
11.2 oz M
8.8 oz W
8.5 oz M Lightest
Stack
40/35mm
Drop
5mm
Release
2018 Q2
2019 Q2
2023 Q1 Newest
MSRP
$150
$140 Lower MSRP
$145
Best price
$149.99
Ratings
Overall
Bottom-tier (55)
Below average (69)
Exceptional (99) Best overall
Comfort
Bottom-tier (56)
Below average (63)
Exceptional (99) Best comfort
Cushioning
Decent (77)
Decent (75)
Exceptional (99) Best cushioning
Durability
Good (81)
Good (84)
Very good (92) Best durability
Appearance
Decent (75)
Good (81)
Very good (91) Best appearance
Value
Bottom-tier (52)
Decent (71)
Good (88) Best value
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.