4/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Aug 28, 2014
45 mpw training for a marathon
- Comfort
- 4/5
- Durability
- 4/5
- Appearance
- 3/5
- Value
- 3/5
Trail shoe · Stability · Trail · 9.9 oz · 30/20mm stack · 10mm drop
Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The ASICS GT-2000 3 replaced it
How it ranks
The ASICS GT-2000 2 trails most trail shoes in our data. Durability and cushioning are its strongest sub-ratings. Comfort scores well below its other sub-ratings. The rating is based on 59 runner reviews and 14 other rated shoes in the GT-2000 product line.
Confidence
How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.
Confidence
99 Very high
Based on
The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.
“Put in as much as 800 miles on a pair without getting hurt or feeling any difference in comfort”
“Durability is a real problem. Lucky to get 300 miles”
“Mesh at the toe wears out easily, big toe creates a hole after about 250 miles”
“High price was worth every penny—wouldn't be running without this shoe”
“At least 600–700 miles before needing a new pair”
“Rarely get injured. Every time I switch brands I get injured”
“Provides good support/responsiveness for high mileage runners without being too soft”
“Feels a bit less cushioned and springier than the GT-2000 1, which I definitely like”
“Thick enough to absorb the impact from stones and other uneven objects”
“Crush the midsole after about 300 miles”
“Never had an injury that put me out more than a few days”
“No longer injure the arch, ankles no longer roll over”
“Heel counter wears thin and gives blisters”
“Wear out the toe rubber before anything else on the shoe”
“Mess with the toebox every few years and it gives me blisters”
“Give enough support without messing with my stride”
“Tried a new shoe and had injuries flare up within a week”
“The size felt smaller than what I'm used to for this size number”
“Blisters on the medial side of second toe and lateral side of third toe”
“Laces are way too short”
36% 18/50
No offers available
Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.
Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.
Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale
Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.
Better Shoes Rating
Each dot is one version of the GT-2000, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.
Release year
2026 · 0 reviews
64 Below average
73 Confidence
2025 · 4 reviews
67 Below average
81 Confidence
2024 · 13 reviews
71 Decent
87 Confidence
2023 · 21 reviews
74 Decent
90 Confidence
2022 · 16 reviews
68 Below average
87 Confidence
2021 · 9 reviews
68 Below average
90 Confidence
2020 · 5 reviews
65 Below average
86 Confidence
2019 · 7 reviews
58 Bottom-tier
87 Confidence
2019 · 14 reviews
71 Decent
92 Confidence
2017 · 14 reviews
65 Below average
94 Confidence
2017 · 8 reviews
74 Decent
89 Confidence
2016 · 3 reviews
61 Below average
86 Confidence
2015 · 15 reviews
50 Bottom-tier
92 Confidence
GT-2000 2 This shoe
2014 · 59 reviews
53 Bottom-tier
99 Confidence
2013 · 46 reviews
51 Bottom-tier
97 Confidence
Sizing and ride details at a glance.
4/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Aug 28, 2014
45 mpw training for a marathon
4/5
Overall
teambody · Aug 28, 2014
20 mpw training for a half marathon
5/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Aug 27, 2014
70 mpw training for a half marathon
4/5
Overall
leberry · Aug 27, 2014
80 mpw training for a marathon
5/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Aug 27, 2014
35 mpw training for a half marathon
Other shoes worth considering.
See how this shoe compares to others like it.