Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

HOKA Challenger ATR 2

Trail · Neutral · 9.8 oz · 5mm drop · 31/26mm stack

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The HOKA Challenger ATR 4 replaced it

How it ranks

The HOKA Challenger ATR 2 ranks below most trail shoes in our data. Cushioning and looks are its strongest sub-ratings. The rating rests on 1 runner review and 5 other rated shoes in the Challenger ATR product line. Another 11 reviews would set the confidence on this shoe's own reviews.

Current estimate: Decent

72/100
Overall
72
Cushioning
89
Appearance
68
Comfort
67
Durability
67
Value
64
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence will score low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

21/100

21

Based on product-line history, external ratings, and 1 runner rating.

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Sep 14.


Pros

  • Light at 9.8 oz for a 31mm heel stack, on a 5mm drop.
  • The one reviewer so far used it for high mileage through a cross country season and credits the sturdy sole with keeping him injury free.

Cons

  • Durability draws 3 out of 5 in the single review so far, and that reviewer wore a hole in the toe box.
  • The Challenger ATR 6 scores 86 on six reviews against its 70.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

Challenger ATR 2 rates 72. This shoe has very low certainty. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the HOKA Challenger ATR

Each dot is one version of the Challenger ATR, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.
  • Challenger ATR 7

    2025 · 9 reviews

    70 Decent

    61 Confidence

  • Challenger ATR 6

    2020 · 6 reviews

    85 Good

    71 Confidence

  • Challenger ATR 5

    2019 · 6 reviews

    76 Decent

    69 Confidence

  • Challenger ATR 4

    2017 · 4 reviews

    66 Below average

    44 Confidence

  • Challenger ATR 3

    2017 · 2 reviews

    76 Decent

    29 Confidence

  • Challenger ATR 2 This shoe

    2017 · 1 review

    72 Decent

    21 Confidence

Reader Ratings

1 rating
5/5 0
4/5 1
3/5 0
2/5 0
1/5 0

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
9.8 oz
Release
2017 Q3
MSRP
$130
Stack Height
31mm heel - 26mm toe
Drop Height
5mm

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 1–1 of 1 written review

Worth EVERY SINGLE DOLLAR - Worth your time too

4/5

Overall

I purchased these shoes as trainers for my sophomore high school cross country season, mainly to function as my shoes for long and aerobic runs. This would've been during the summer of 2015, right around the time that Hoka was gaining the attention that it reaps from the running community now. I got these for the purpose of high mileage, but also because I liked trying new types of shoes out. I will add that I attribute much of my injury free training to switching between 2-3 pairs of shoes at a time, but do firmly believe that the sturdy sole of the Challenger ATR successfully mimicked the feeling of a sturdy surface, building up the strength in my feet, as well as raising the ever so important arch. The ATR 2's are light but capable; they perform well on every surface I've used them on. If I am going on vacation and am unsure as to what kind of surfaces I will 'run' into, I always bring these along, because I know they will function well in all sorts of runs. I will mention however that the toe box (near my pinkie toe) developed a hole and deteriorated rather quickly, which I suppose is something to expect for high mileage shoes. Other than the wearing away of the toe boxes, the sole and base of the shoe have retained plenty of tread and thread over the many, many miles I have run. I definitely recommend these shoes to those of you who don't mind wearing an older pair of shoes, and who are also looking for a cheaper pair of sturdy Hoka's, as opposed to their newer recently released versions. I know that they most likely have improved on the newer versions, but still. there is always Duct Tape!

Anonymous runner · Feb 9, 2018

55 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 32

Comfort
4/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
3/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
5/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from HOKA

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Reference shoe
Newest
Lightest / Best overall / Best comfort
Shoe properties
Type
Trail
Daily trainer
Trail
Pronation
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Weight
9.8 oz M
8.6 oz M Lightest
Stack
31/26mm
37/32mm
Drop
5mm
5mm
Release
2017 Q3
2025 Newest
2024 Q2
MSRP
$130 Lower MSRP
$155
Best price
$115.25
Ratings
Overall
Decent (72)
Decent (70)
Exceptional (98) Best overall
Comfort
Below average (67)
Below average (63)
Very good (92) Best comfort
Cushioning
Good (89)
Good (82)
Exceptional (98) Best cushioning
Durability
Below average (67)
Below average (66)
Very good (92) Best durability
Appearance
Below average (68)
Below average (64)
Good (87) Best appearance
Value
Below average (64)
Bottom-tier (58)
Excellent (93) Best value
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.