Daily trainer · Neutral · Road · 6.7 oz · 28/18mm stack · 10mm drop
Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The Nike Zoom Pegasus Turbo Shield WP replaced it
How it ranks
The Nike Zoom Pegasus Turbo 2 is one of the strongest daily trainers in our data. Looks and comfort are its strongest sub-ratings. Value scores well below its other sub-ratings. The rating is based on 32 runner reviews and 3 other rated shoes in the Zoom Pegasus Turbo product line.
Confidence
How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence is low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.
Confidence
97 Very high
Based on
The bars show roughly how much each source contributes to this shoe’s rating. Their influence depends on how many reviews we’ve collected, how many earlier versions are in the product line, and the external ratings available.
“Feel like clouds on recovery days, but put the work in on speed days.”
“After the second run, the fin split in half. The ZoomX and react foam split and ripped.”
“The ZoomX foam would erode on the back outside heel easily after 100 miles in the original, but the PT2's show no wear after 100.”
“Shave off about 20 seconds per mile compared to other shoes.”
“The ZoomX foam is very comfortable—cushioned and responsive—and didn't show noticeable wear until after 300 miles.”
“The most comfortable training shoe ever. Great cushioning, light weight, good stability.”
“Feels good the first 150 miles and then slowly feels flat after that.”
“Not as bouncy as the original, but they traded bounce that wore out quickly for more speed.”
“Much lighter and less bulky, easier to run and felt like I was gliding.”
“Enough cushion and softness, and the midsole doesn't feel dead—I feel energy return.”
“Worth up to $130, but not $180.”
“They have that bounce specific to the ZoomX shoes. You also feel that pop of the react foam within the first few strides.”
“Lack of cushioning causes some pain in feet and knees.”
“Very smooth/cushioned ride with great ROI for the price tag.”
“The heel actually separated from the base of the shoe after 300-400km.”
“A little tight in the forefoot, which bothered me on longer runs (more than 12 miles).”
“Would repurchase if price was not $180. Way too much for a trainer.”
“The sole wears down relatively quickly (~150 miles).”
“The heel protrusion is a little weird and elf-like.”
“Don't feel good with the upper; I have high instep.”
59% 23/39
No offers available
Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.
Prices updated daily. Last checked Oct 22.
Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale
Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.
Better Shoes Rating
Each dot is one version of the Zoom Pegasus Turbo, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.
Release year
2022 · 23 reviews
70 Decent
90 Confidence
2020 · 1 review
83 Good
69 Confidence
2018 · 52 reviews
91 Very good
99 Confidence
Zoom Pegasus Turbo 2 This shoe
2019 · 32 reviews
96 Excellent
97 Confidence
Sizing and ride details at a glance.
4/5
Overall
Lots of goods, but I definetly don't feel good with the upper; I have high instep.
Luis Andrade · Dec 15, 2023
25 mpw training for 5K and 10K came from the Newton Motion 8
5/5
Overall
MNTiger2018 · Feb 8, 2021
80 mpw training for a half marathon came from the HOKA Rincon 2
5/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Sep 9, 2020
55 mpw training for middle distance came from the Nike Zoom Pegasus 35 Turbo
5/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Apr 7, 2020
12 mpw training for a half marathon
5/5
Overall
Anonymous runner · Jan 30, 2020
100 mpw training for a marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35
Other shoes worth considering.
See how this shoe compares to others like it.
