Type a shoe name, like Pegasus, Clifton or Kayano.

Altra Escalante Racer

Racing · Neutral · Road · 6.9 oz · 0mm drop · 24/24mm stack

Discontinued — we no longer see this shoe in stock. The Altra Escalante Racer 2 replaced it

How it ranks

The Altra Escalante Racer is one of the strongest racing shoes in our data. Comfort and durability are its strongest sub-ratings. Value scores well below its other sub-ratings. The rating rests on 22 runner reviews and 1 other rated shoe in the Escalante Racer product line.

Altra Escalante Racer

of 5

Excellent

96/100
Overall
96
Comfort
98
Durability
80
Appearance
72
Cushioning
72
Value
62
Confidence

Confidence

How settled the rating is against every other rated shoe. A shoe can rate high on confidence with relatively few reviews of its own when its product line has a long record and external ratings from retailer sites agree. Confidence will score low when we have few ratings or when runners disagree.

See the product line's history

Confidence

92/100

92

What runners say

“The cushioning is even better than before, with a just little bit less sink and more bounce.”
5/5 Full review 80 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Altra Superior 3.5
“Surprisingly durable with the stitched upper, I've had several pairs in which the upper is like new even after running over 1,000 miles in.”
4/5 Full review 20 mpw training for a marathon came from the Skechers Go Meb Speed 3
“It feels very soft, but stays dynamic in the meantime.”
5/5 Full review 80 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Altra Superior 3.5
“Because of the zero drop platform it is hard to get up on your toes to race a 5k-10k when changing gears.”
4/5 Full review 40 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Altra Escalante 1.5
“This shoe is firmer, has more energy return and is lighter than the current Escalante's.”
5/5 Full review 50 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35
“The knit type of mesh is extremely open, so forget this shoe for dirt roads, trail running, or cold weather.”
5/5 Full review 80 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Altra Superior 3.5
“I killed the foam after only 400km.”
4/5 Full review 25 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Vibram FiveFingers Bikila EVO
“No grip while running on moist asphalt.”
4/5 Full review 40 mpw training for a marathon came from the adidas adizero Boston 7
“After 400km they just started to feel hard.”
4/5 Full review 25 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Vibram FiveFingers Bikila EVO
“It has an incredible amount of pop.”
5/5 Full review 75 mpw training for a half marathon came from the HOKA Clayton 2

Prefer this shoe over another

55% 11/20

Where to buy

No offers available

Affiliate links included. They never affect our ratings.

Prices updated daily. Last checked Sep 14.


Pros

  • Reviewers praise the wide toe box and zero-drop fit.
  • At 6.9 oz, reviewers race halves and marathons in it.
  • Many runners find it lively at tempo with clear road feel.

Cons

  • It lists at $140, three reviewers call it expensive, and value is the lowest-rated dimension at 4.0 out of 5.
  • Three reviewers warn the open knit upper is poor in cold, wet or off-road use.
  • Three reviewers wear the outsole or the foam out early, though others report 1000 miles and more.

Rating & Confidence vs. other shoes for sale

Each dot is one rated shoe for sale, placed by its rating and by how much evidence sits behind it. Shoes toward the top right are both well rated and well established.

Confidence
50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100

Better Shoes Rating

Escalante Racer rates 96. This shoe has high certainty. See how we rate shoes.

Better Shoes Rating of prior versions of the Altra Escalante Racer

Each dot is one version of the Escalante Racer, placed by its rating and release year. The gold dot is this shoe.

Rating

Release year

We use the reviews of past versions to inform this shoe’s rating. See why.
  • Escalante Racer 2

    2024 · 3 reviews

    83 Good

    61 Confidence

  • Escalante Racer This shoe

    2018 · 22 reviews

    96 Excellent

    92 Confidence

Reader Ratings

22 ratings
5/5 15
4/5 7
3/5 0
2/5 0
1/5 0

Specs & fit

Sizing and ride details at a glance.

Weight
6.9 oz
Release
2018 Q1
MSRP
$140
Stack Height
24mm heel - 24mm toe
Drop Height
0mm

Runner reviews

Write a review

Showing 6–10 of 16 written reviews

A true modern day flat

5/5

Overall

A great shoes for those looking to add something more minimalist. Can do anything from normal runs to workouts. 

Jgt11 · Jun 8, 2023

50 mpw training for 5K and 10K came from the New Balance FuelCell Propel v3

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
4/5

Great minimal racers

5/5

Overall

Grat for any paces, flexible, great transitioń and ride. Wide and comfy in forefoot area! Standard durability of midsole and outsole apprx 600 km for me.

Anonymous runner · Mar 17, 2022

came from the adidas adizero Adios 4

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
3/5
Appearance
3/5
Value
3/5

Great cushioning, just not for long!

4/5

Overall

These were my first shoes with any cushioning after running over 1000 miles in Vibrams. At first, these were great in rotation, with bouncy cushioning and felt ready for speed. Bought in size EU 44, which is my usual goto size (I find EU sizes more reliable for some reason). The size and the toebox are great and they are very easy to slip into. I used these to break my 5K PR 25 flat, down to 21:15, my 10K PR from 50 flat to 45 flat. Then finally crushed my half marathon time from 2:13 to 1:43. I strained my calf after going too hard too close to my half effort, so it wasn't the fault of these shoes! Then a few months later after 400km they just started to feel "hard" and I had to work even for an easy pace. I started to notice the initial signs of Plantar Fasciitis but managed it with rolling. Shortly after I bought the Hoka Carbon X and the pain went away and I noticed running was easy again. I tried these again recently and even my Merrell Vapor Glove 3D felt like it had more spring (which makes no sense as it has no cushioning). So I can only assume I killed the foam after only 400km. Mind you, 95% of my running is on roads and concrete, so maybe I was hard on these guys! I do love these shoes if I could get them cheaper (in Japan they are very expensive) I would get them again. The main reason I'd pick the Vibrams over these is durability and price. My original Vibrams were half the price and lasted 1600km before retirement, whilst my second pair are fine after 500km.

Anonymous runner · Mar 30, 2020

25 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Vibram FiveFingers Bikila EVO

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
5/5
Durability
3/5
Appearance
4/5
Value
4/5

Reader review

4/5

Overall

Been through two pairs- Boston and 4th of July Cons: -Soles wear out fast -No grip while running on moist asphalt -Not responsive; no snap; feel dead; cushion is non responsive Pros: -Perfect toe-box -ZERO DROP -Recovery run shoe -Light -Breathable

Anonymous runner · Jan 26, 2020

40 mpw training for a marathon came from the adidas adizero Boston 7

Comfort
5/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
3/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
4/5

Quick comparison to Escalante 1/1.5

5/5

Overall

Just got a pair of these in because I couldn't find Escalante 1 or 1.5 discounted low enough to where I'd buy them. (I'm a cheap ass and think more than $70 for a pair or running shoes expected to last < 1000 miles is too much.) My biggest concern was that the Racer version would be too uncomfortable on the roads here in Colorado, but new out of box, I'd say the cushioning experience is similar to The One 2.5, which used to be my favorite shoe; in other words, not quite as cush as the Escalante but still very comfortable. Otherwise, it feels identical to my Escalante 1 and 1.5. Neutral and light. Note that they probably shaved most weight from the upper. It is no good at all for winter here, but could be quite welcome in the summer heat or in race conditions. Recommended. By the way--I'm 5'5" 120 pounds. Your durability and value ratings would likely vary based on your own size and willingness to pay for shoes.

Anonymous runner · Jan 9, 2020

55 mpw training for a half marathon came from the Altra Escalante 1.5

Comfort
4/5
Cushioning
4/5
Durability
4/5
Appearance
5/5
Value
3/5

Alternatives

Other shoes worth considering.

More from Altra

Compared to other shoes

See how this shoe compares to others like it.

Current shoe
Choose a model
Lightest / Best comfort / Best durability
Newest / Lowest price
Best overall / Best cushioning / Best appearance
Shoe properties
Type
Racing
Speed / workouts
Racing
Pronation
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Weight
6.9 oz M Lightest
7.7 oz M
Stack
24/24mm
Drop
mm
8mm
Release
2018 Q1
2024 Q2 Newest
2024 Q1
MSRP
$140
$295
Best price
$99.88 Lowest price
$142.82
Ratings
Overall
Excellent (96)
Good (83)
Exceptional (99) Best overall
Comfort
Exceptional (98) Best comfort
Very good (90)
Excellent (95)
Cushioning
Decent (72)
Bottom-tier (60)
Exceptional (97) Best cushioning
Durability
Decent (80) Best durability
Decent (77)
Below average (64)
Appearance
Decent (72)
Bottom-tier (58)
Excellent (96) Best appearance
Value
Below average (62)
Bottom-tier (60)
Good (84) Best value
Specific shoe

Search for the exact model to add to this comparison.